Economic Polarization in Madhya Pradesh: A District Wise Analysis

  • Rekha Acharya devi ahilya university
  • sweksha mahendra khobragade devi ahilya university
Keywords: Employment, polarization, inequality, consumption expenditure, NSSO, WPR, inclusive growth


Economic polarization among different regions is common phenomenon in literature and it results into unequal growth and income inequalities within regions. Economists points out that whenever economies achieve higher growth they presumed that it would automatically trickle down to poor. Anderson (1964) and Aaron (1977) pointed out that there is an inverse relationship between economic growth and income distribution. So in this present paper we analyze economic polarization in Madhya Pradesh over the two decades 2000 and 2011 using per capita consumption expenditure (PCCE) and work participation rate (WPR). We show that multidimensional polarization (on rural-urban and region) has increased since the 2000. Overall, our results suggest that high growth witnessed by Madhya Pradesh since the bifurcation of it in the year 2000 has been associated with widening disparities within districts. Out of total 50 districts, same 15 numbers of districts is in high and middle income group and 20 are in low income group. Comparing MPCE and WPR trends, we find similarities but also some differences; our study contributes to the study of polarization in one of the grooming Bimaru state.      

Author Biographies

Rekha Acharya, devi ahilya university
reader school of economics devi ahilya university Indore
sweksha mahendra khobragade, devi ahilya university
Junior Research Fellow in school of economics devi ahilya university Indore


Autor, David, and David Dorn (2013) “The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market” American Economic Review 2013, 103(5): 1553–1597

Aylin Koç; AhmetYılmaz Ata and Zeynep Çirkin, Empirical Investigation on Globalization and Social Polarization: Cross Country Analysis (2013) International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues Vol. 3, No. 1, 2013, pp.206-213 ISSN: 2146-4138

Bandyopadhyay, S. (2003) Polarization, stratification and convergence clubs: Some dynamics and explanations of unequal economic growth across Indian states. Mimeo, LSE

Brzezinski, Michal. (2013), “Income Polarization and Economic Growth” National Bank of
Poland Working Paper 147

Chakravarty, S. R. (2009) Inequality, Polarization and Poverty: Advances in Distributional Analysis (New York: Springer)

Himanshu, (2007) “Recent Trends in Poverty and Inequality: Some Preliminary Results,” Economic and Political Weekly, 42, pp. 497-508 (2007)

Juan Antonio Duro, (2005) another look to income polarization across countries Journal of Policy Modeling 27 (2005) 1001–1007
Kawadia, Ganesh and S.S. Philips (2014) ‘Shedding the Bimaru Tag: Madhya Pradesh, Bihar & Rajasthan’ Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XLIX NO. 31, august 02, 2014

Lawrence Mishel, John Schmitt, and Heidi Shierholz (Jan. 4–6 2013), assessing the job polarization explanation of growing wage inequality, economic policy institute 202.775.8810

Motiram, S. and N. Sarma (2011) ‘Polarization, Inequality and Growth: The Indian experience’ ECINEQ Working Paper 2011-225, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality

Noorbakhsh, Farhad, Spatial Inequality and Polarization in India (September 2003). Credit Research Paper No. 03/16. Available at SSRN: or

Schmidt, A. “Statistical Measurement of Income Polarization. A Cross-National Comparison” (University of Cologne, Germany 2000)

Sripad Motiram & Nayantara Sarma (2014) Polarization, Inequality, and Growth: The Indian Experience, Oxford Development Studies, 42:3, 297-318, DOI:10.1080/13600818.2014.897319

Tapas Mishra, Mamata Parhi, Claude Diebolt, and Prashant Gupta (2010), do social polarization and stochastic shocks matter for Convergence speed of income?, Bureau of Economic Theory and Applications
How to Cite
Acharya, R., & khobragade, sweksha. (2015). Economic Polarization in Madhya Pradesh: A District Wise Analysis. Journal of Global Economy, 11(2), 153-164. Retrieved from

Most read articles by the same author(s)