Environment Regulations and Trade in Environment Goods: The Case of India

  • Falguni Pankaj Desai Maniben Nanavati Women's College
Keywords: OECD and APEC list of Environment goods, exports, imports, Revealed Comparative Advantage


The paper weaves together three strands of arguments which, favour trade in environment goods for achieving sustainable development and provides an analyses of potential for trade in environment goods in India. Firstly, there are different paths, models, tools for achieving sustainable development and green economy is one of them. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) defines a green economy as one that results in “improved human well-being and social equity, while significantly reducing environmental risks and ecological scarcities” (UNEP 2010). The report suggests trade in environment goods and service as one of the strategies towards achieving green economy and sustainable development. International trade is an important engine of development and sustained economic growth. Studies have shown that trade does lead to environment degradation, but trade in cleaner technologies and environment goods can play an important role in sustainable development. Trade can become a powerful vehicle for transferring environmental friendly technology between countries, paving way for sustainable development. India stands to benefit both, from importing environment goods to clean up its environment and exporting environment goods to the world, thus contributing to the goal of sustainable development. Secondly, the 2001 Doha Ministerial Declaration urged members to reduce or eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers on environmental goods and services, paving way for a triple win situation for trade, the environment and development (WTO, 2001). The reduction or elimination of tariff and non tariff barriers would increase trade in environmental goods which, can help mitigate the adverse impact of increased economic activity on environment. The quality of life of citizens would improve due to better access to clean water, air, sanitation, and clean energy. Moreover, the liberalization of trade in environmental goods will enable developing countries to obtain technology, tools for development addressing environment priorities. Thirdly, new environment regulations, trade liberalization, increased privatization, current programmes of rural electrification, investment in infrastructure projects, government investment in research and capacity building initiatives have increased demand for environmental goods in India. India is partner to a number of international agreements on environmental issues. Legal activism and pressure from NGOs have fostered networking between industries and between industries and NGOs for improving the environment. These pressures from above and below are supporting the growth of the environmental market. It is in this context that the paper examines trade in environment in India.


Keywords: OECD and APEC list of Environment goods, exports, imports, Revealed Comparative Advantage


JEL Classification: F10, F18


• Balassa, Bela (1965): Trade Liberalization and ‘Revealed ‘Comparative Advantage’, Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33 pp 90-123
• Belcher, K; A. L. Hobbs and William A. Kerr (2003): The WTO and environmental sustainability: is there a conflict? Int. J. Environment and Sustainable Development, Vol. 2, No. 1
• Bhagwati , Jagdish (2004): In Defense of Globalization, Oxford University press, Oxford
• de Melo and Vijil, M(2014) The Critical Mass Approach to Achieve a Deal on Green Goods and Services: What is on the Table? How Much to Expect? FREDI, WORKING PAPER 107, Development Policies
• GoI Ministry of Commerce & Industry(2003): Trade liberalization in Environmental Goods: consideration for India, New Delhi
• Hamwey, R. M.(2005): Environmental Goods: Where Do the Dynamic Trade Opportunities for Developing Countries Lie? A Cen2eco Working Paper prepared to support discussions at the Hong Kong Trade and Development Symposium and the Sixth WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong
• Hamwey,R(2005): Environmental Goods : where do the dynamic trade opportunities for developing countries lie?, International Trade , 0512015, EconWPA
• http://www.greentribunal.gov.in/NGT_ACTS.aspx Accessed in July 2018
• http://www.unep.org/annualreport/2010/pdfs/UNEP-AR-2010-FULL-REPORT.pdf July 2018
• http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/rio20_e.htm: Harnessing Trade for Sustainable Development and a Green Economy, Accessed in July 2018
• http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/bey2_e.htm:The environment: a specific concern, Accessed in June 2018
• http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/hist1_e.htm: Early Years: Emerging Environment debate in GATT/WTO, Accessed in July 2018
• https://www.fundoodata.com/industry-companies/environment/11.html
• https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm#tradeenvironment: Accessed August 2018
• https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_e.htm : Early years : emerging debate in GATT/WTO, Accessed August 2018
• https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_neg_serv_e.htm An introduction to trade and environment in the WTO, Accessed in June 2018
• https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_wto2004_e.pdf : Accessed August 2018
• ICTSD (2012): Trade and Environmental Briefings : Trade in Environmental Goods , Policy Brief 6
• ICTSD Programme on Trade and Environment (2007): Trade in Environmental Goods & Services and Sustainable development, Policy discussion paper
• Jha, Veena (2008): Environmental Priorities and Trade Policy for Environmental Goods: A Reality check, International Centre for Trade & Sustainable development , Issue paper no. 7
• Kallimmal, M; Khushwaha, H(2014): ‘Doha Negotiations and India’s Trade in Environment GOODS: Analysis of NAMA Sectoral Impact, working paper No:13,Centre for WTO Studies, IIFT, New Delhi
• K. Sivaramakrishnan (2011) : ‘Environment, Law, and Democracy in India’, The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 905-928, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41349969
• Kenneth, M & R, Steenblik (2005): Environmental Goods and Services A Synthesis of country studies, OECD Trade and Environment working papers 2005/3, OECD publishing http:/dx.doi.org/10.1787/280726722646
• Khatun, F (2010): Trade Negotiations on Environmental Goods and Services in LDC context, UNDP, New York
• Mishra, Arabinda, Shailly Kedia, and Madhumita Mishra(2014): Green Economy in South Asia: Challenges and Opportunities.Kathmandu: South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment (SAWTEE).
• OECD(2003): Environmental Goods: A comparison of APEC and OECD Lists, OECD, Paris
• Ratna, R.S; Kallummal, M & Gurung, H (2010): WTO Negotiations on Market Access on Environmental Goods: Identification of existing NTMs on Proposed Items, Centre for WTO Studies, New Delhi
• Sauvage, J. (2014), “The Stringency of Environmental Regulations and Trade in Environmental Goods”, OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, 2014/03, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjn7xsnmq-en
• Sawhney, Aparna (2003) “Liberalization of Environmental Services”, for “Seminar on Trade Liberalization in Environmental Goods and Services” UNCTAD, TERI and Union Ministry of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi. p. 7
• Sawhney, Aparna (1999) “GATT/WTO and Environmental Provisions”, in Bhattacharyya, B., Seattle and Beyond: The Unfinished Agenda, New Delhi: Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT).
• Sawhney, Aparna (2002) “Greening Indian Business for the World Market” Working Paper No. 181, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore.
• Sawhney, Aparna and Chanda, Rupa (2003) “Trade in Environmental Services: Opportunities and Constraints” Working Paper No. 102, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi.
• Shankar, S & Mehta, P.B. (2008): Courts and Socioeconomic Rights in India. 146-182. 10.1017/CBO9780511511240.006.

• Singh, Sandeep (2004a) “Trade Preferences and Growth of Environmental Industry: Issues and Implications for India”Working Paper, Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi.
• Singh, Sandeep (2004b) “Trade Preferences and Growth of Environmental Industry: Issues and Implications for India”, Indian Journal of Economics & Business 3(2): 289-313.
• Suathan, Mahesh (11 October 2004) “International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), “Environmental Goods and Services Negotiations: Challenges and Opportunities” Presentation in “WTO Workshop on Environmental Goods: Para 31 (iii) of the DDA”, Geneva
• UNCTAD 2003, Environmental Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Central American and Caribbean Countries. Geneva : UNCTAD.
• UNCTAD(1995): Environmental Preferable Products (EPPs)as a trade opportunity for developing countries, UNCTAD/OCM/70, Geneva
• UNCTAD(2003): Environmental Goods: Trade statistics of developing countries, TD/B/COM.1/EM.21/CRP.1 , Geneva
• Vikhlyaev, A. (2004), Environmental Goods and Services: Defining Negotiations or Negotiating Definitions? Journal of World Trade 38 (1): 93-122.
• WTO(2003): Industrial Tariff Liberalization and the DOHA Development Agenda, WTO,
• WTO(2003): OECD Joint working party on Trade and Environment : Environmental Goods: A comparison of the APEC &OECD Lists, WT/CTE/W/228, TN/TE/W/33
• WTO(2005) : Canada’s Initial List of Environmental Goods, TN/TE/W/50 , WTO
How to Cite
Desai, F. P. (2019). Environment Regulations and Trade in Environment Goods: The Case of India. Journal of Global Economy, 15(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v15i2.585

Most read articles by the same author(s)