A Study of Diversification in Exports of China and India

  • Falguni Pankaj Desai 'Maniben Nanavati Women's college'
Keywords: Exports, Comparative advantage, Trade, Intensive & Extensive margins


The paper presents a detailed comparative study of the evolution in the direction and composition of exports of China and India between 1993 and 2010. The changes in the direction of exports is analyzed through country/commodity intersection by grouping countries together on the basis of income of which there are eight groups, and changes in the composition of exports is examined by employing the Revealed comparative advantage index and decomposing the growth in exports in terms of Intensive (existing products) and Extensive margins (new products) following the methodology of Amiti and Freund (2007). To analyze the country/commodity intersection and to compute the RCA index, the exports are classified into 5 main groups/categories: Product A group: Primary Products, Product B group: Natural Resource Intensive Products, Product C group: Unskilled Labour Intensive Products, Product D group: Technology Intensive Products, and Product E group: Human Capital Intensive Products and Sectors not classified according to factor intensity. The main findings of the study are: i) High income OECD plus non- OECD countries had dominant but declining shares in all the five product categories of  exports of China and India, ii) China’s comparative advantage has shifted from Unskilled labour intensive group to  Technology intensive group, but India continues to have comparative advantage in exporting Primary and Unskilled labour intensive products  and, iii) the growth in exports of China and India was mainly accounted for by high growth of Intensive margins rather than in Extensive margins.

Author Biography

Falguni Pankaj Desai, 'Maniben Nanavati Women's college'

Associate Professor, Department of Economics



• Amiti, M.1997. ‘Specialization Patterns in Europe’ Discussion paper NO. 363, Centre for Economic Performance, London
• Amiti, M and C Freud.1997. “An Anatomy of China’s Export Growth” paper presented at Trade conference -Global Implication of China’s Trade, Investment and Growth, IMF
• Balassa Bela. 1965.Trade Liberalization and ‘Revealed ‘ Comparative Advantage’, Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33 pp 90-123
• Batra Amita and Zeba Khan.2005. “Revealed Comparative Advantage: An Analysis For India and China”, ICRIER working paper no. 168 , August
• Bernard A, J Bradford, S Redding and P K Schott. 2009. “The Margins of US Trade”, NBER Working paper series, No. 14662.
• Besedeš T and T Prusa. 2011. “The Role of Extensive and Intensive Margins and Export Growth”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 96, Issue 2, November, pp 371-379.
• Brenton, P and R Newfarmer.2007. “Watching More than the Discovery Channel: Export Cycles and Diversification in Development,” Policy Research Working Papers, No. 4302, (Washington DC: World Bank).
• Broda, C and D Weinstein. 2006. “Globalization and the Gains from Variety”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), pp 541-585.
• Feenstra Robert & Hiau Looi Kee. 2005. " Trade Liberalization and Export Variety: A Comparison of China and Mexico The World Bank
• Feenstra, Robert. 1994. “New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices”, American Economic Review, 84(1), pp 157-177.
• Feenstra, Robert. 2006. “New Evidence on the Gains from Trade”, Review of World Economics 142 (4), pp 617-641.
• Felbermayr, Gabriel and Wilhelm Kohler. 2006. “Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade”, Review of World Economics, Volume 142, Issue 4.
• Funke, Michael and Ralf Ruhwedel. 2001a. “Product Variety and Economic Growth : Empirical Evidence from the OECD Countries,” IMF Staff Paper 48(2), pp 225-242.
• Funke, Michael and Ralf Ruhwedel.2003. “Export Variety and Economic Growth in East European Transition Economies”, BOFIT Discussion Papers, No.8, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economic in Transition, BOFIT.
• Grubel, Herbert G. and Peter J. Lloyd. 1975. Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products, New York: Wiley.)
• Hausmann, R, J Hwang and D Rodrik. 2007. “What you Export Matters” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol.2, Issue 1, pp 1-25.
• Hillberry, Russell H. & McDaniel, Christine A. 2002. "A Decomposition of North American Trade Growth since NAFTA," Working Papers 15866, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Economics
• Hinloopen, J. and Charles van Marrewijk.2004. “Empirical relevance of the Hillman condition and comparative advantage”, TI 2004-019/2, Tinberger Institute Discussion Paper, Tinberger Institute.
• Hoekman, B. and S. Djankov. 1997. “Determinants of the Export Structure of Countries in Central and Eastern Europe,” The World Bank Economic Review, Vol.11, No.3, September, pp.471-487.
• Hummels, D and P, Klenow. 2005. “The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Export”, American Economic Review, 95(3), pp 704-723.
• Kaminski, B. 1999. “Hungary Foreign Trade Issues in the Context of Accession to the EU” World Bank Technical Paper, No.441 The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
• Kandogan, Yener. 2003. “Does Product Differentiation Explain the Increase in Exports of Transition Countries?, William Davidson Institute, Working Paper Number 599.
• Kandogan, Yener.2004. “How much Restructuring did the Transition Countries Experience? Evidence from Quality of their Exports”. William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 637, January
• Krugman, Paul R. 1979. "Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade," Journal of International Economics 9, (November), pp. 469-479.
• Krugman, Paul R. 1980. "Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade," American Economic Review 70, pp. 950-959.
• Lall, Sanjaya. 2000. “The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-1998” Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 28, Issue 3, pp 337-369.
• Marconi, Daniela and Valeria, Rolli. 2007. “Comparative advantage patterns and domestic determinants in emerging countries: An analysis with a focus on technology” working paper No.638, BANCA D’ITALIA
• Porter, Michael E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.
• Ricardo, D. 1817. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.
• Rodrik, Dani.2006. “What’s so Special about China’s Exports?”, NBER Working Paper No. 11947.
• United Nation COMTRADE Database. Available at: comtrade.un.org accessed in January 2011.
• http//www.UNcomtrade
• http://www.data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
• http://wwww.unctad.org/en/Pages/Statistics.aspx
• https://www.wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/Restricted/Login.aspx
How to Cite
Desai, F. P. (2015). A Study of Diversification in Exports of China and India. Journal of Global Economy, 11(4), 253-272. https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v11i4.410