• Sumeet Gupta
  • Vinay Kandpal
Keywords: Hedging, Commodity Futures, Price Trend, Clearing House


The Indian Agriculture Sector is on the edge of a rebellion that will revolutionize the complete food chain by means of the total food production in India is expected to twofold in the following ten years. Outstanding export projections, competitive pricing of agricultural products that are internationally comparable has created trade prospects in the agro industry. Agricultural Output is expected to grow by 11% in 2018-2019 after recording a 8-9 % increase in the previous years. It will create Indian Agriculture Industry Gateway by which exporter and importer can fulfill their requirement and reap the benefits of agro related opportunities. MCX (Multi Commodity Exchange) and NCDEX (National Commodity Derivatives Exchange) has developed opportunities for trading in spot and forward trade. It will help to develop India as Agricultural Based Economy. Trading of agricultural commodities help the traders to take the advantage of Price Fluctuations but also faces Investment Risk and Price Risk. Movement in future prices create the possibility for short


1. Lubos Pastor, Pietro Veronesi: ‘Stock prices and IPO waves’, University of Chicago, July 4 2003.
2. Ko Wang, Jing Yang: ‘A Sequential Search Model for IPO Pricing and Contracting’, August 2006.
3. Kuntara Pukthuanthong: ‘Biotech IPO Valuation: R&D, Human Capital Quality, And Underwriter Education’, San Diego State University, January 14, 2005.
4. Onur Bayar: ‘IPOs versus Acquisitions and the IPO Valuation Premium Puzzle:
An Empirical Analysis’, October 15, 2006.
5. Daniella Gelman: ‘Examining IPO Valuation Methods – Market Comparables and Discounted Cash Flow’, May 2006.
6. ALEXANDER LJUNGQVIST and WILLIAM J. WILHELM, JR.; ‘IPO Pricing in the Dot-com Bubble’, Feb 2002.
7. Chitru S. Fernando, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Paul A. Spindt: ‘Offer Price, Target Ownership Structure and IPO Performance’, 1999.
8. Baber, W.R., S.N. Janakiraman, and S. Kang, 1996, “Investment Opportunities and the
Structure of Executive Compensation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 21, 297-318.
9. Beatty, R. and J. Ritter, 1986, “Investment Banking, Reputation and the under pricing of Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Financial Economics 15. 213-232.
10. Beatty, R., S. Riffe and R. Thompson, 2000, “IPO Pricing with Accounting Information,” Working paper, Southern Methodist University.
11. Buchinsky, M., 1998, “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research,” Journal of Human Resources 33, 88-126.
12. Leland, H. and D. Pyle, 1977, “Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation,” Journal of Finance 32, 371-387.
13. Ofek, E. and M. Richardson, 2001, “The IPO Lockup Period: Implications for Market Efficiency and Downward Sloping Demand Curves,” Working paper, New York University
14. Baily, M.N. and R.Z. Lawrence, 2001, “Do We Have a New E-conomy?” Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. Ofek, E. and M. Richardson, 2003, “Dotcom Mania: The Rise and fall of Internet Stock Prices,” Journal of Finance 58, 1113-1138.
16. Agarwal, R.K. and A. A. Samwick, 1999, “Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Finance 54, 1999-2043.
17. Chan, L.K.C. and J. Lakonishok, 1992, “Robust Measurement of Beta Risk,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 265-282.
18. Downes, D. and R. Heinkel, 1982, “Signaling and the Valuation of Unseasoned New Issues,” Journal of Finance 37, 1-10.
19. Eckbo, B.E., R. M. Giammarino and R. L. Heinkel, 1990, “Asymmetric Information and the Medium of Exchange in Takeovers: Theory and Tests,” Review of Financial Studies 3, 651-675.
20. Kim, M. and J.R. Ritter, 1999, “Valuing IPOs,” Journal of Financial Economics 53, 409-437.
21. Klein. A., 1996, “Can Investors Use the Prospectus to Price Initial Public Offerings?”
How to Cite
Gupta, S., & Kandpal, V. (2018). HEDGING IN AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES. Journal of Global Economy, 14(4), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v14i4.496