Purchasing Power Parity for Developing Countries: Evidence from Panel Unit Root Tests

Authors

  • Manjinder Kaur Guru Nanak Dev University College Chungh, Tarn Taran, Punjab,India- 143304
  • Navpreet Kulaar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v19i4.706

Keywords:

Purchasing Power Parity, Panel Unit Root, Geographic region.

Abstract

The current study focuses on examining the robustness of the PPP theory for a sample of 40 developing economies categorised on the basis of geographical location. For this purpose, all the data series of real exchange ratesof selected economies have been checked for stationarity by employing three different methods of panel unit root tests namely Levin, Lin and Chu, ADF-Fisher Chi-square and PP-Fisher Chi-square test. The findings support the existence of strong PPP for the groups of South Asian, South-East Asian and Latin American countries. On the contrary, the group of African and Middle Eastern nations fail to exhibit stationarity in real exchange rate and thus do not support the validity of PPP for these group of nations.This implies that external balance of an economy where PPP holds will not be influenced by long-run or short-run shocks but for the nations where the validity of PPP is rejected the internal economic shocks pose a challenge for the external economic balance of home currency exchange rate.

Author Biography

Manjinder Kaur, Guru Nanak Dev University College Chungh, Tarn Taran, Punjab,India- 143304

Dr. Manjinder Kaur (manjindergndu@gmail.com) is Assistant Professor in Post Graduate department of Guru Nanak Dev University College, Chungh (Tarn Taran). She is a post graduate and doctorate in the area of impact of foreign institutional investment on Indian capital market. Her research and teaching areas of interest are international finance, portfolio management, stock market efficiency and foreign institutional investors’ investment. She has 15 years of teaching experience and specializes in the area of stock market efficiency and foreign investment. To date, she has 8 publications in various journals of national and international repute.

References

Al-Gasaymeh, A., Ahmed, G., Mehmood, T., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2019). Co-Integration Tests and the Long-Run Purchasing Power Parity: A Case Study of India and Pakistan Currencies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(4), 570–583.

Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Kasem, J. (2015). Strong and Weak Form of Purchasing Power Parity: The Case of Jordan and its Major Trading Partners. Journal of International Business and Economics, 3(1), 93–108.

Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Kasem, J. (2016a). Long-Run Purchasing Power Parity and Exchange Rates: Evidence from the Middle East. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 10(2), 41–53.

Al-Gasaymeh, A., & Kasem, J. (2016b). Purchasing Power Parity and Country Characteristics: Evidence from Panel Data Tests. Global Economy and Finance Journal, 8(2), 63–77.

Al-Gasaymeh, A., Kasem, J., & Alshurideh, M. (2015). Real Exchange Rate and Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis: Evidence from ADF Unit Root Test. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 14(2), 28–39.

Al-Zyoud, H. (2015). An Empirical Test of Purchasing Power Parity Theory for Canadian Dollar-US Dollar Exchange Rates. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(3), 233–240.

Borsic, D., & Beko, J. (2006). Testing the Theory of Purchasing Power Parity for Slovenia and Hungary. Eastern European Economics, 44(4), 82–96.

Chortareas, G., & Kapetanios, G. (2013). How Puzzling is the PPP Puzzle? An Alternative Half-life measure of Convergence to PPP: How Puzzling is the PPP Puzzle? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28(3), 435–457.

Chowdhury, I. (2007). Purchasing Power Parity and the Real Exchange Rate in Bangladesh: A Nonlinear Analysis. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 12(1), 61–75.

Dimitriou, D., & Simos, T. (2013). Testing purchasing power parity for Japan and the US: A structural-break approach. Japan and the World Economy, 28(1), 53–59.

Drine, I., & Rault, C. (2008). Purchasing Power Parity for Developing and Developed Countries. What can we learn from Non-Stationary Panel Data Models? Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(4), 752–773.

Hassan, K., Hoque, A., & Koku, P. S. (2015). Purchasing Power Parity in the SAARC Region: Evidence from Unit Root Test with Cross-Sectional Dependence. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(5), 129–137.

Hoque, A., & Banerjee, R. (2014). The Stationarity of South Asian Real Exchange Rates Allowing for Structural Breaks. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 8(3), 45–54.

Lafrance, R., & Schembri, L. (2002). Purchasing-Power Parity: Definition, Measurement, and Interpretation. Bank of Canada Review, 27–33.

Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.

Suranovic, S. (1997). Introduction to Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Chapter 30.

Taylor, M. P. (2006). Real exchange rates and Purchasing Power Parity: Mean-reversion in economic thought. Applied Financial Economics, 16(1–2), 1–17.

Downloads

Published

06.01.2024

How to Cite

Kaur, M. and Navpreet Kulaar (2024) “Purchasing Power Parity for Developing Countries: Evidence from Panel Unit Root Tests”, Journal of Global Economy, 19(4), pp. 263–273. doi: 10.1956/jge.v19i4.706.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.