A Study of Interplay between Quantitative Ease by US and other Trading Partners and Rupee Volatility

Authors

  • Manjinder Kaur Guru Nanak Dev University College Chungh, Tarn Taran, Punjab,India- 143304
  • Navpreet Kulaar Research Fellow, university School of Financial Studies, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1956/jge.v19i3.701

Keywords:

exchange rate, Volatility Quantitative Easing

Abstract

In the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008-09, leading Central Banks (like the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan) have introduced a multiplicity of untraditional monetary policy measures, so as to stimulate the economies and curb the severity of inflation at the international level. Quantitative Easing may be defined as a policy measure that results in an expansion of the Central Bank’s balance sheet, with an augmentation in the level of the bank’s money in the economy (Bernanke and Reinhart, 2004).

Analysts claim that the strengthening of the dollar, which is being supported by the US Fed Reserve's constant rate hikes to counter rapidly rising inflation, is the principal reason behind the depreciation of the Indian rupee. Moreover, other aspects including the withdrawal of foreign institutional investors also affected the rupee strength and macroeconomic dynamics. According to the IMF, the strength of the dollar causing serious problems such as tightening financial conditions and raising the price of imported goods and services in many emerging economies such as India. Furthermore, an instant hike in oil prices driven by the war between Russia and Ukraine also weakened the rupee and consequently India's current account deficit reaching an absolute record high in the third quarter of the year 2022.

No doubt, in comparison to US dollars, the value of the Indian Rupee has deteriorated in international markets. But at the same time, there are other currencies where the rupee still holds the top spot when evaluated against other currencies throughout the world. Notwithstanding all the challenges, our union finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman reportedly announced that the Indian rupee is considerably better positioned than other international currencies against the greenback. Moreover, these days, India has consistently been working toward making the Indian rupee an international currency and Indian government has progressed significantly towards assigning this status to Indian rupee. In the opinion of certain economists, despite the split, our national currency is still in a stronger position than other currencies when analysed against the US dollar.

Author Biography

Manjinder Kaur, Guru Nanak Dev University College Chungh, Tarn Taran, Punjab,India- 143304

Dr. Manjinder Kaur (manjindergndu@gmail.com) is Assistant Professor in Post Graduate department of Guru Nanak Dev University College, Chungh (Tarn Taran). She is a post graduate and doctorate in the area of impact of foreign institutional investment on Indian capital market. Her research and teaching areas of interest are international finance, portfolio management, stock market efficiency and foreign institutional investors’ investment. She has 15 years of teaching experience and specializes in the area of stock market efficiency and foreign investment. To date, she has 8 publications in various journals of national and international repute.

References

Bahmani, S., & Toms, J. (2015). Assessing the Effect of Quantitative Easing on Foreign Direct Investment in Brazil. The American Economist, 60(2), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451506000207

Bernanke, B. S., & Reinhart, V. R. (2004). Conducting Monetary Policy at Very Low Short-Term Interest Rates. American Economic Review, 94(2), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302118

Cho, D., & Rhee, C. (2013). Effects of Quantitative Easing on Asia: Capital Flows and Financial Markets. ADB Economics Working Paper Series.

Coudert, V., Couharde, C., & Mignon, V. (2011). Exchange rate volatility across financial crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(11), 3010–3018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.04.003

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531

Gujarati, D. (2004). Basic Econometrics (4th Edition). MacMillan, New York.

Keefe, H. G., & Saha, S. (2022). Foreign Exchange and Global Monetary Shocks: The Asymmetric Effects of Advanced Economies’ Quantitative Easing on Exchange Rate Volatility in Emerging Markets. International Economic Journal, 36(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2022.2098353

Paul, M., & Kalluru, S. R. (2019). The Impact of US Quantitative Easing on India’s Money Market. In M. Michaelides (Ed.), Research in Finance (pp. 45–66). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0196-382120200000036003

Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.

Venkataramanan, S. (2014). Impact of Quantitative Easing on Emerging Markets: A study on Indian Markets. Liverpool John Moores University.

Vinogradov, A. A. (2019). Estimation of Impact of Quantitative Easing Policy on EUR/USD using Behavioral Equilibrium Exchange Rate Model. Finance: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2019-23-4-117-128

Downloads

Published

08.10.2023

How to Cite

Kaur, M. and Kulaar, N. (2023) “A Study of Interplay between Quantitative Ease by US and other Trading Partners and Rupee Volatility”, Journal of Global Economy, 19(3), pp. 181–200. doi: 10.1956/jge.v19i3.701.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.